UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: \”Churchill White Paper\” – UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document #excerpts# #1 July 1922#
via UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: \"Churchill White Paper\" – UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922).
JohnPaulGettelman notes the natural proper language of the term PalestineArab! Note the early times or historical era of ideas at root,of normal usage of PalestineArab! This author, JohnPaulGettelman, prefers the text form of space conserving, single word style, when not only space saving, but idea economizing clarity of one word! PalestineArab vs. Palestine Arab is my personal choice, in this matter! But Palestine Arab is as good as PalestineArab! Palestine as the Latinized Philistine does not even sound ok as Philistinian! So we would not say the JudaeanHebrew war against Philistinians! We might say the Philistine army, country, Philistine giants or anything else but not Philistinian! So it is also true in PalestineArab or Palestine Arab as Palestine rooted, Palestine people, Palestine citizen or Palestine province of the greater ArabEmpire,Arab Empire,ArabistEmpire or Arabist Empire! This put’s to rest the false engraved imprint of Palestine free radicals! Palestine Ions do exist in chemistry! Palestine Eons do exist in history! But Palestine people are PalestineArab or Palestine Arab, not Palestinian, any more than Philistinian!